How to prepare for storms and cope with bad weather
15:02, 27 февраля 2026Мир
。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45
16. 从2025年国民经济运行情况看2026年市场变化趋势：从投资驱动增长到结构与效率驱动增长, www.idc.com/resource-ce…。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
雷军：小米坚持十倍投入打造一台安全的好车。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.